Thursday, April 30, 2009

Condo Insurance Requirements

If you live in a condominium or manage a condominum Illinois law specifies minimum amounts of insurance the condominium association must carry.  

As you probably know, in Illinois, most aspects concerning a condominium are governed by statute in 765 ILCS 605, commonly known as the Illinois Condominium Property Act(the “Act”).  Specifically, Section 12 of the Act discusses the insurance requirements for a condominium.  As a condominium you are required to maintain property insurance, general liability insurance, a fidelity bond (if you have more six or more units), and directors and officer’s coverage.

             Section 12(a)(1) discusses the requirements for property insurance.  The property insurance must cover the common elements, the units, and limited common elements.  The individual units should be covered to the extent of the bare walls, floors, and ceilings.  It is the individual unit owner’s responsibility to purchase insurance for the personal contents of the unit.  You must provide coverage for special form causes of loss and increased costs of construction due to building code requirements at the time the insurance is purchased and at each renewal date. Lastly, the total amount of the coverage can be no less than the full insurable replacement cost of the insured property less the deductibles. 

Section 12(b)(2) covers the general liability requirement.  You must have coverage for claims and liabilities arising in connection with the ownership, existence, use, or management of the property.  The amount of the policy has to be a minimum of $1,000,000, however, given the size of your condominium you may want to discuss a larger coverage amount with your insurance agent.  You must include as additional insureds: the board, the association, the manager and their respective agents and employees, and the unit owners to the extent of claims arising out of their use of the common elements. 

 Section 12(3)(A-C) discusses the fidelity bond.  All condominiums with six or more units are required to obtain one.  The bond must cover both the management company and the individual manager, their employees or agents who have access or control over association funds.  The amount of the bond for both the company and individuals must be in the full amount of the association funds and reserves that are in the custody of the association or management company.

 Section 12(3)(D) covers the director’s and officer’s liability coverage.  This needs to cover all contracts or actions taken by the board in their official capacity as directors and officers, excluding actions for which directors or officers are not entitled to indemnification by law.  You may decide the amount of coverage to carry if it is not already established in the declaration or bylaws.  

These are the minimium amounts required by Illinois law.  Like the mininium required amounts of automobile coverage, your situation might warrant having more coverage than the legally required minimum amount.

It might be a good idea to check with your insurance agent to determine whether you have the proper coverage.

Disclaimer

This is a passive blog and the materials contained herein are provided for informational purposes only. Nothing contained in this blog should be interpreted as a solicitation of business and none of the information contained herein constitutes legal advice. The law is subject to change without notice, and the local laws of your residence may be different from the general information displayed on this blog. You should not rely on the information provided on this blog without first consulting an attorney. Contacting this website does not establish and attorney/client relationship between you and its publisher Christopher W. Matern.

An attorney/client relationship can only be established with Christopher Matern by engaging in direct person-to-person contact with Christopher Matern. Christopher Matern does not intend to practice law in any jurisdiction in which he is not licensed.

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Secretary of State Jesse White on Online Filing Fees

In a January 23rd post , I wrote about Illinois Secretary of State premium/penalty for filing annual reports online.  The premium that Secretary of State charges for filing online is 50% above the normal filing cost.  Since then I had the opportunity to speak with Illinois Secretary of State Jessie White personally.

I gave Secretary White my reasons opposing his online filing fee premium.  I told him in an era of heightened environmental consciousness, his policy was anti-green.  It not only wasted paper, but required more fuel usage for mail delivery.  I also said that discouraging filing online meant more staff intensive handling of paper files.

Secretary White gave me the “Springfield Smile.”  The “Springfield Smile” is a look a politician gives you before he is going to pass the blame to someone else.  Secretary White followed his “Springfield Smile” with the response that his fees were set by the legislature. So, it was “out of his control.”  Secretary White’s response was disingenuous.  While it is technically true that the state legislature approves his fees, they act on his recommendation.

Perhaps a call, letter or e-mail to your state representative and state senator asking for an explanation of why Secretary of State Jesse White should be discouraging online filing might be helpful.

You can find the name of your state representative and state senator along with their addresses by clicking on this link to the Illinois Board of Elections.  


Disclaimer

This is a passive blog and the materials contained herein are provided for informational purposes only. Nothing contained in this blog should be interpreted as a solicitation of business and none of the information contained herein constitutes legal advice. The law is subject to change without notice, and the local laws of your residence may be different from the general information displayed on this blog. You should not rely on the information provided on this blog without first consulting an attorney. Contacting this website does not establish and attorney/client relationship between you and its publisher Christopher W. Matern.

An attorney/client relationship can only be established with Christopher Matern by engaging in direct person-to-person contact with Christopher Matern. Christopher Matern does not intend to practice law in any jurisdiction in which he is not licensed.

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

Directors & Officers' Duty to Creditors

In normal situations, a corporation's directors and officers owe a fiduciary duty to the corporation and its shareholders.  But when a corporation becomes insolvent, that duty shifts to the corporation's creditors.  In these challenging economic times, this duty by corporate directors and officers to the corporation's creditors could lead to lawsuits from creditors against the directors and officers personally.

If a corporation is insolvent, contemplating bankruptcy or has filed for bankruptcy protection a suit by its creditors is likely a useless effort. However, the corporation may have a directors and officers liability insurance policy and/or the at least some of the directors and officers may personally have money.  So if creditors can sue the directors and officers personally the suit may be worthwhile.

For the duty to creditors to exist, the corporation must be insolvent.  So when is a corporation insolvent?  A corporation can be insolvent even before it has filed for bankruptcy protection or done an assignment for the benefit of creditors.  A recent Illinois federal district court opinion stated that "A corporation is insolvent when its liabilities far exceed its assets, or when it is unable to pay its debts."

For creditors this may provide another path to repayment.  For directors and officers of financially challenged corporations, it is one more of many risks to consider.

Disclaimer

This is a passive blog and the materials contained herein are provided for informational purposes only. Nothing contained in this blog should be interpreted as a solicitation of business and none of the information contained herein constitutes legal advice. The law is subject to change without notice, and the local laws of your residence may be different from the general information displayed on this blog. You should not rely on the information provided on this blog without first consulting an attorney. Contacting this website does not establish and attorney/client relationship between you and its publisher Christopher W. Matern. 

An attorney/client relationship can only be established with Christopher Matern by engaging in direct person-to-person contact with Christopher Matern. Christopher Matern does not intend to practice law in any jurisdiction in which he is not licensed.

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Avoiding Probate for Custodial Accounts

To save taxes and make gifts to children, grandchildren, nieces or nephews, many people have created custodial accounts. These accounts are commonly known by their initials UGTMA (Uniform Gifts to Minors Act) or UTMA (Uniform Transfers to Minors Act). They can be relatively low cost ways to make gifts to minors and good for tax planning.

But without good planning they can create problems in the future. The problems arise if you have not named a successor custodian. Without a successor custodian, upon your death or disability, a probate case would need to be filed before any money could be distributed.

Since these accounts are typically funded with relatively modest amounts, having to later file a probate case would be relatively costly.

Two ways to avoid this problem are:

1) name successor custodians for each of the accounts or

2) make a global designation of successor custodian for all custodial accounts in your Living (Revocable) Trust or Will.

This is another example were proper planning can avoid costly expenses.


Disclaimer

This is a passive blog and the materials contained herein are provided for informational purposes only. Nothing contained in this blog should be interpreted as a solicitation of business and none of the information contained herein constitutes legal advice. The law is subject to change without notice, and the local laws of your residence may be different from the general information displayed on this blog. You should not rely on the information provided on this blog without first consulting an attorney. Contacting this website does not establish and attorney/client relationship between you and its publisher Christopher W. Matern.

An attorney/client relationship can only be established with Christopher Matern by engaging in direct person-to-person contact with Christopher Matern. Christopher Matern does not intend to practice law in any jurisdiction in which he is not licensed.