Thursday, January 29, 2009

Government "Bad Bank" Plan May Slow Mortgage Relief

The federal government has been considering creating a new bank to buy all the high risk loans held by private banks.  This new bank has been nicknamed the "bad bank" because it would hold only high risk loans.

The "bad bank" plan is the subject of an article by Greg Burns in today's Chicago Tribune (the link to the article is below).

In addition to the risks to taxpayers discussed in Greg Burns' article, there is another potential problem.  That is banks that are currently negotiating with their borrowers on modify their loans may decide to wait to see if the Federal Government does in fact create a "bad bank"   Waiting may not be could for borrowers who every day get further behind on their payments

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/columnists/chi-thu-bad-bank-burns-jan29,0,5378928.column

Federal Goverment May Modify Mortgages

Federal Government Plan on Modifying Mortgages

The Federal Reserve is planning to modify mortgages where it holds the loans as collateral for Federal Reserve payments to the lender.

As Fox News reported (the link to the story is at the bottom of this post), homeowners will not know if the Federal Reserve is holding their loan as collateral.  The homeowners will have to wait for the servicing company to contact the homeowner.

If you or a person you know is have problems paying their mortgage this is something to ask them about.

http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/federal-reserve-modify-mortgages/

Monday, January 26, 2009

Second Marriages – A Critical Time for Estate Planning

Second Marriages – A Critical Time for Estate Planning

 A second marriage when there are children from a first marriage can unintentionally disinherit those children.

 A recent “cocktail party” question illustrates the unfortunate possibilities.

 A 61 year old man recently dies leaving a wife and several adult children from a previous marriage.  The man had no estate plan.  Also, he and his second wife were in the process of divorce.  But when he died, the divorce was not final so he was still legally married to his second wife.

 With no estate plan, the man’s estate would go ½ to his wife that he had not yet divorced and ½ to his children. 

 If this man had been asked week before he died if it was his intention to leave ½ of his estate to the woman he was in the midst of divorcing how likely is it that he would have answered “No.” (The “bereaved widow” brought her boyfriend to his wake.)

The story could have been worse.  The man could have put most of his assets into joint tenancy with his second wife after he married her.  Then when he died his wife would have received all those assets.  There would not have been a 50-50 split of those joint tenancy assets with his children.

 Major life changes are good time to prepare or revise an estate plan.  Second marriages are certainly one of them.

 

Disclaimer

 This is a passive blog and the materials contained herein are provided for informational purposes only. Nothing contained in this blog should be interpreted as a solicitation of business and none of the information contained herein constitutes legal advice. The law is subject to change without notice, and the local laws of your residence may be different from the general information displayed on this blog.  You should not rely on the information provided on this blog without first consulting an attorney. Contacting this website does not establish and attorney/client relationship between you and its publisher Christopher W. Matern

 

     An attorney/client relationship can only be established with Christopher Matern by engaging in direct person-to-person contact with Christopher Matern Christopher Matern does not intend to practice law in any jurisdiction in which he is not licensed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Friday, January 23, 2009

Reasons Why You Need A Will

There are many reasons why you need a Will.  A recent article in Forbes Magazine discusses many of them.  You can read the Forbes article "Why You Need A Will at

http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/17/will-livingtrust-intestate-pf-in_ae_0119taxes_inl.html

Briefly, if you don't have a Will, the State will provide one, but the State law may not be what you want done.

Another excellent reason, which the article did not discuss, for parents of young children is to name guardians for the children.

Disclaimer

This is a passive blog and the materials contained herein are provided for informational purposes only. Nothing contained in this blog should be interpreted as a solicitation of business and none of the information contained herein constitutes legal advice. The law is subject to change without notice, and the local laws of your residence may be different from the general information displayed on this blog.  You should not rely on the information provided on this blog without first consulting an attorney. Contacting this website does not establish and attorney/client relationship between you and its publisher Christopher W. Matern

An attorney/client relationship can only be established with Christopher Matern by engaging in direct person-to-person contact with Christopher Matern Christopher Matern does not intend to practice law in any jurisdiction in which he is not licensed.

Jesse White’s Latest Money Grab

Jesse White’s Latest Money Grab

Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White has instituted a new policy that

 

  • Increases fees to businesses
  • Discourages efficiency in his office and
  • Wastes paper

Jesse White’s office has instituted an additional $50.00 fee for the convenience of filing annual reports online.  This new fee is in addition to the existing $5.00 processing fee.  So, the total fee for filing online is now $55.00.

This is 55% of the existing fees.  That is pretty heavy “juice” for the convenience of online filing.

With businesses watching every penny to keep their doors open, now is not the time for a 50% increase in fees.

With a state government budget that is deeply in the red, now is not the time to encourage staff intensive procedures such as handling documents and payments by hand.

With a heightened concern for the environment including saving paper, now is not the time to discourage people from filing documents online.

If you think Jesse White’s new fees are not the kind of change for which you were hoping and voting, click on the e-mail link below.

In red, is a portion of Secretary of State Jesse White’s web site regarding the new fees.

Please Note: The pilot promotional program (with no expedited fee charges) for Web site filing of Certificates of Good Standing and Annual Reports expired November 30, 2008. Expedited processing fees will now be assessed on these transactions effective December 1, 2008. If you have any questions you may contact the Department of Business Services at 217-782-6961 or via email.

Below is a table of the annual report filing fees with the new online fee highlighted.


Annual Report Filings



Your Fee For This Transaction

Franchise Tax:

$25.00

Filing Fee:

$75.00

Penalty:

$0.00

Interest:

$0.00

Payment Processor Fee:

$5.00

Expedited Fee:

$50.00

Total Fee:

$155.00


 

 

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Bankruptcy Reform Proposal from Senator Durbin

This is a press release from Senator Dick Durbin regarding his proposed bankruptcy reform legislation.

The text of Senator Durbin's bill can be found at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:S.61:

DURBIN DISCUSSES FORECLOSURE CRISIS, MORTGAGE BANKRUPTCY REFORM WITH HOUSING SECRETARY NOMINEE

 Wednesday, January 14, 2009

 [WASHINGTON, D.C.] – U.S. Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) met with Shaun Donovan, President-elect Barack Obama’s nominee to head the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), today, where he discussed the foreclosure crisis with the nominee and confirmed Donovan’s support of Durbin’s Helping Families Save Their Homes in Bankruptcy Act, a bill that will allow homeowners at risk of foreclosure to alter the terms of their mortgages in bankruptcy.

 

Shaun Donovan will be an excellent HUD Secretary and will play a central role in the resolution of the current housing crisis,” Durbin said. “Under his leadership, HUD can help stem the tide of foreclosures and move the housing market, and the broader economy, back on track. I look forward to working closely with him to help those at risk of foreclosures keep their homes.”

 

Durbin urged Donovan to see that the bankruptcy measure would be part of the upcoming economic recovery package. Donovan agreed that judicial modifications of troubled mortgages are appropriate and pledged to work towards its quick passage.

Earlier this month, Durbin reintroduced legislation that would change the outdated bankruptcy code to allow at-risk homeowners to alter the terms of their mortgages in bankruptcy. He first introduced this bill in the fall of 2007, when experts estimated that nearly 2 million homeowners were at risk of losing their homes to foreclosure. Over the last fourteen months, that number has quadrupled. Today nearly 8.1 million homeowners - 16 percent of all homeowners - are at risk of foreclosure.

 

Last week, Citigroup, one of the nation’s largest mortgage lenders, announced its support of the legislation, splitting the industry that had once opposed the bill.

 

President-Elect Obama announced his plans to nominate Mr. Donovan on December 13th. Donovan, the current head of New York City’s Department of Housing Preservation and Development, will play a major role in reversing the current housing and economic crisis in the Obama Administration.

 

At his confirmation hearing yesterday before the Senate Banking Committee, Donovan said, “Clearly the most important public policy decision facing Congress and the new Administration is how to best ease the economic pain that millions of American families are feeling right now because of our unsteady housing markets. Housing is at the root of the market crisis we are now experiencing, and HUD must be part of the solution.”

 

Monday, January 19, 2009

Bankruptcy - A Consumer's Overview

A Consumer's Overview of Bankruptcy 

Why is there Bankruptcy protection?

  •  The bankruptcy code is designed to protect you and help you regain your life after financial disaster. 

 Bankruptcy is NOT failure.

  •  It is a tool for success and getting back on track.

 Bankruptcy is NOT irresponsibility. 

  •  The vast majority of bankruptcy cases do not involve people who were simply frivolous with their finances.
  •  Most common causes of bankruptcy are: job loss, divorce, high medical bills from injury or serious illness, death of a supporting family member, poor economic conditions.

 

Bankruptcy does NOT simply protect debtors.

 

  • While the Bankruptcy code does help debtors get rid of debt, it also protects creditors to make sure all creditors are treated fairly.  

 

  • If you have a customer who owes you money and is filing for bankruptcy, the Bankruptcy code can help you get the most money you can toward what you are owed.

 

Bankruptcy does NOT leave you destitute.

 

  • Most people who file for bankruptcy can keep their house, car, and other personal belongings.  The Bankruptcy code is designed to leave you with the tools necessary to begin a new financial life.

 

Types of Bankruptcy

 

For individuals there are two ways of filing for bankruptcy:

 

  • Chapter 7 “Liquidation” Bankruptcy

 

  • Chapter 13 “Debt Reorganization” Bankruptcy

 

“Chapter 7” Liquidation Bankruptcy

 

Liquidation Bankruptcy is governed by Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code.

 

v    In a Chapter 7, all of your non exempt assets are “turned over” to the Bankruptcy trustee and are sold and distributed to the creditors.  With a couple exceptions, any new assets acquired after the bankruptcy petition is filed belong to the debtor and are out of the reach of pre-bankruptcy creditors.  This gives the debtor their “fresh start.”

 

What Chapter 7 Does and Does Not Do.

 

Chapter 7 DOES:

 

  • Discharge almost all of a debtor’s debt:

 

ü     Credit card bills

ü     Hospital bills

ü     Certain taxes

ü     Department store bills

ü     Bills for personal services

 

  • Reduce the amount of secured debt to the market value of the secured debt

 

    • For example, if you have $300,000 left on a home mortgage, but the market value of the home is only $250,000, the amount due on the mortgage gets “stripped down” to $250,000.  The $50,000 deficiency is discharged.   However, the bank can still foreclose when the case is discharged.

 

Chapter 7 DOES NOT:

 

v    Discharge debts secured by a lien or a mortgage:

 

ü     Mortgage on property

ü     Purchase money lien on a vehicle

ü     Judgment liens

ü     Tax liens

v    Discharge certain “priority” debts

 

ü     Child support

ü     Alimony

ü     Damages owed on a drunk driving case

ü     Income taxes assessed within 3 years of filing

ü     Condo assessments

 

“Chapter 13” Debt Reorganization Bankruptcy

 

Unlike a Chapter 7, a Chapter 13 reorganizes the debt.  This means the debtor keeps all their property and does not turn any over for liquidation. Most debtors who file Chapter 13 are attempting to stop a foreclosure and/or catch up on a mortgage.  In Chapter 13 you enter into a payment plan generally for 5 years where you pay off your secured debt and a fraction of your unsecured debt.  Debtors MUST have a steady stream of income to file for Chapter 13.  If there is no steady stream of income, a Chapter 13 plan cannot be confirmed.

 

Chapter 13 DOES:

 

v    Give the debtor time to pay off non-dischargeable items secured by:

 

ü     Mortgages

ü     Tax liens

ü     Judgment liens

 

v    Allow a debtor to catch up on past due mortgage payments

 

v    Allow the debtor to pay off only a portion of most debt with the remainder discharged

 

o      For most debts usually ten cents on the dollar

 

v    Force all creditors to accept the payment plan approved by the Bankruptcy judge

 

Chapter 13 DOES NOT:

 

·       Reduce the amount due on a home mortgage or car loan to the market value of the property

 

o      If you have $300,000 left on a home mortgage but the market value of the property is $250,000, you will still owe the $300,000 and do not get the “strip down” offered in Chapter 7

 

·       Get approved unless ALL of the debtor’s disposable income goes to the payment plan for the entire 5 year period.

 

The Automatic Stay

 

Regardless of which way you file bankruptcy, you will have the protection of the automatic stay.  The automatic stay becomes effective immediately upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition.

 

What is the automatic stay? 

 

  • The automatic stay is like an impenetrable steel door slamming down between the debtor and all the creditors.  Once the automatic stay is in effect, ALL creditors (including governmental creditors like the IRS) must immediately stop ALL actions to collect debts from the debtor.  The automatic stay generally remains in effect until the case is discharged. 
  • While the automatic stay is in effect:

     

    Ø     Creditors are not allowed to call the debtor or send letters;

    Ø     Any foreclosure actions and collection lawsuits are halted;

    Ø     Creditors cannot repossess property AND sometimes must GIVE BACK property recently repossessed:

    Ø     Utilities, including cable and internet service providers must continue service to the debtor

    Ø     Creditors who violate the automatic stay can be fined, lose their priority or even be imprisoned by the Bankruptcy court!!

     

    BE WARNED:  Sometimes creditors can argue that they are not receiving “adequate protection” under the bankruptcy case and will ask the court to lift the automatic stay for their claim.  Courts will sometimes do this if a debtor missed scheduled payments during the bankruptcy case or the debtor has no equity in the property.  However, generally the automatic stay will remain in effect until the discharge of the case.

     

     

    Which Chapter DO I choose?

     

    Why would people choose to enter into a five year payment plan under Chapter 13 rather than file a Chapter 7 immediate discharge of the debt??

     

    Ø     Most people who file for Chapter 13 are trying to save their home from a foreclosure.  In Chapter 13, you can catch up on mortgage payments and get the mortgage reinstated.

     

    o      In Chapter 7, if you cannot come up with all the past due mortgage payments by the time of discharge (generally 60-90 days after filing), the lender will often continue with the foreclosure when the case is over.

     

    Ø     Some debts, like recent income taxes, are not dischargeable.  Entering Chapter 13 lets you pays those taxes over the 5 year plan, AND, the IRS only gets the interest rate allowed by the Bankruptcy Code, not the IRS preferred penalty rates.   

     

    Which Chapter CAN I choose?

     

    The Bankruptcy Code now limits who may file for Chapter 7 and who must file for Chapter 13 based on the debtor’s income and the number of dependents in their household:

     

    ·       If your income is below a certain median income set by the Bankruptcy code, you may automatically file for Chapter 7. 

     For example in Illinois the median income levels are

    STATE

    1 earner

    2 people

    3 People

    4 People

    Illinois

    $45,606.00

    $57,829.00

    $66,189.00

    $78,182.00

     

    ·       If your income is above the median, then you must go through the Bankruptcy Code’s “Means Test”.  If you are above the Means Test limit, you may not file for Chapter 7 and may only file for Chapter 13.

     

    Can I do both?

    The so called “Chapter 20”

     

    • Some people will enter a Chapter 7 bankruptcy to discharge all the unsecured debt, and then immediately file a Chapter 13 bankruptcy to get a payment plan for paying off all the non-dischargeable debt.

     

    • Under current bankruptcy law, generally this is harder to do because the law sets a minimum amount of time between filing a Chapter 7 and then a Chapter 13.

     

    • However, some courts will allow a debtor to file a Chapter 13 while a Chapter 7 is pending, but this is a rare circumstance. 


    Disclaimer

     

    This is a passive blog and the materials contained herein are provided for informational purposes only. Nothing contained in this blog should be interpreted as a solicitation of business and none of the information contained herein constitutes legal advice. The law is subject to change without notice, and the local laws of your residence may be different from the general information displayed on this blog.  You should not rely on the information provided on this blog without first consulting an attorney. Contacting this website does not establish and attorney/client relationship between you and its publisherChristopher W. Matern

          An attorney/client relationship can only be established with Christopher Matern by engaging in direct person-to-person contact with Christopher Matern ChristopherMatern does not intend to practice law in any jurisdiction in which he is not licensed.